|
0. INTRODUCTION
I'm sure somone with some website has already
posted something similar to this page, but the fact that the
information here has been sought after time and time again indicates
that those other websites are either hard to find or rare.
In this page, I illustrate the five possible
wiring configurations of a dual voice-coil, DVC, driver unit followed
by the corresponding changes in the Thiele-Small Parameters.
1. DUAL VOICE-COIL WIRING CONFIGURATIONS

Parallel Voice-Coils
Revc/2
Levc/2
Qms
Qes
Qts = Qms*Qes/(Qms+Qes)
Bl
|

Series Voice-Coiils
2*Revc
2*Levc
Qms
Qes
Qts
2*Bl
|

One Disconnected Voice-Coil
Revc
Levc
Qms
2*Qes
calculate Qts
Bl
|

One Shorted Voice-Coil
Revc
Levc
Qms = (Revc/((Revc*Rmd)+(Bl*Bl)))*sqrt(Mmd/Cmd)
2*Qes
calculate Qts (unchanged, actually)
Bl
|

Adjustment Resistor Connected to one
Voice-Coil
Revc
Levc
Qms = ((Revc+R)/(((Revc+R)*Rmd)+(Bl*Bl)))*sqrt(Mmd/Cmd)
2*Qes
calculate Qts
Bl
|
One Amplifier per Voice-Coil
Revc
Levc
Qms
Qes
Qts
Bl
|
Notes:
Revc |
= |
DC voice-coil resistance |
|
ohms |
Levc |
= |
voice-coil inductance |
|
H |
Qms |
= |
mechanical damping factor |
|
|
Qes |
= |
electrical damping factor |
|
|
Qts |
= |
total damping factor |
|
|
Bl |
= |
electrical-mechanical conversion factor |
|
Tesla.meters |
Sd |
= |
effective cone area |
|
square-meters |
Fs |
= |
resonant frequency of driver |
|
Hz |
Mmd |
= |
mass of driver's cone |
|
kg |
Cmd |
= |
compliance of driver's suspension |
|
m/N |
Rmd |
= |
mechanical resistance in the driver's suspension |
|
N.s/m |
Vas |
= |
equivalent volume of the driver |
|
cubic meters |
|
|
|
|
|
1a. Parallel Voice-Coils
Using this wiring
configuration, the effective resistance is half that of one
voice-coil's resistance. Likewise with the voice-coil inductance -- the
effective voice-coil inductance is cut in half.
1b. Series Voice-Coils
This wiring
configuration yields system Revc, Bl and system Levc that is twice that
when using just one voice-coil.
1c. One Disconnected Voice-Coil
Instead of having 2
voice-coils to electrical damp the resonance of the driver, this
particular wiring configuration only uses one voice-coil -- the other
voice-coil is simply not used or "open-circuited." Because of this, Qes
increases by a factor of two.
1d. One Shorted-Voice Coil
Shorting one of the
voice-coils lowers Qms because the shorted voice-coil provides
electrical damping. On the other hand, Qes doubles because only one
voice-coil is connected to the amp.
1e. Adjustment Resistor on one Voice-Coil
The system Q can be
adjusted by putting a suitable resistor across one of the voice-coils.
Qms is a little lower than 2*Qes when one voice-coil is shorted while
discarding one of the voice-coils does not change Qms. Values of Qms
midway between these two extremes can be achieved by using a suitable
resistor across one of the voice-coils and it can be calculated with
the above-mentioned equation. Qes, due to the other voice-coil, is
double that of the value as with the parallel wiring configuration.
1f. Separate Amplifier for each Voice-Coil
Treating each amplifier
as ideal voltage sources (having no output resistance at all), this
particular wiring configuration is essentially the same as the parallel
voice-coil configuration. Thus, the three system Q values are equal
that of the ones corresponding with the parallel wiring configuration.
The following parameters remain unchanged regardless of wiring
configuration,
Fs
Mmd
Cmd
Rmd
Sd
Vas
2. END
I hope the table above
will help you in calculating the corresponding Thiele-Small parameters
of your dual voice-coil driver. Comments, suggestions and corrections
are welcome of course.
3. Corrections Made
- 25 June, 2002: The
old highlighted equations had R when I meant to say total R --
including Revc. The updated equations above now clearly states this. I
apologize for any inconvenience the old equations might have caused.
|
|